"What I have to do, I do, for the good of my party."

AWESOME!

So you WILL support Obama if HRC asks you to during her consolation speech in Denver!

I don't expect you to donate your time or money to Obama, but I am glad that you will do what is good for the party by joining me in opposing John McCain in the GE.

You are the best Universal!

they are trying to subvert our discussion - who cares about them?

It's easy to sit in the back of the schoolroom all sprawled out and make comments while earnest students are dukin it out.  Easy.  

I actually saw this on Redstate's front page, then another commenter pointed out the Instapundit blog.  I wasn't suggesting that you take orders from right wing blogs, I was suggesting that you are attempting to destroy a Democrat under the guise of "vetting" him.  Even if you DID think Republican 527's would be crazy enough to run an ad like that, it doesn't mean you should be doing their work for them.

But the major national liberal blogs have mostly been bashing Hillary for the last few months, and this is one of the only blogs remaining where concerns about Obama can be read by a wide readership.  So, yes, we should only use reputable information.  But what is reputable is a matter of debate.  Even Michelle Malkin can be right once in a while.  Before anyone takes exception to that, I recall that in the Webb/Allen Senate race at a crucial juncture late in the campaign she called Allen on a smear his campaign was making about Webb.  (Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.)

And I look at content, not labels.  So I disagree with National Review about 90% of the time, but one of their writers has a very good piece today on what the press should have asked Obama about the Rev. Wright.

I do think it is incumbent upon people to cease attacks and debate on the merits.

is your party.

I take it then that you missed Obama's communications director Robert Gibb's work in 2004. The Dean/Osama ad? I think using race or 9/11 as political propaganda against a fellow Democrat is disgraceful, but there is a reason Obama hired Gibbs. And it is one reason I find it very difficult to support Obama.

They are from RedState after all. No surprise there.

Fake Democrats.

watching that 9/11 footage over and over.

I hope you enjoyed watching those people die over and over.

You disgust me - <-- that will get me banned, but a 10 minute hate video by Universal is praised.

Sickening.

has become the door for the right wing talking point.

My have things gotten pretty bad around here.

lol and?

MyDD blurs the lines between a democrat and a republican blog.

and this only further goes to prove it.

but those GOPers should know their candidate isn't as bulletproof as they would hope

they better teach him the difference between Shi'ites and Sunnis before the GE starts

I've been harping on this theme for a while.  The conservative blogs seem clearly to be coalescing around supporting Clinton for the nomination.  The pundit/shill blogs have been trafficking in Rezko and Wright memes, and the comments sections of the community blogs generally show a clear preference for Clinton over Obama--strictly in terms of who they think McCain will do better against.

Does this mean that Clinton should not be the nominee?  Of course not; just because conservatives want something doesn't mean it's wrong.  And I think that Clinton could probably beat McCain in the general anyway.  But it's important to know who those guys support, and for what reasons.

My take on it: they're terrified of facing Obama.

SusanHu, Universal, Larry, and countless other somewhat lesser known MyDD posters have repeatedly linked to the sites you mention, cited right wing sources in print and radio, and even linked to a couple of white supremacist/neo-nazi sites.  It shouldn't be a surprise the right wing is linking back to them, should it?